300 baud was about the speed you could read text on the screen. No offline readers, minimal graphics. It sorta worked. Most message editors were line editors, meaning you didn't have screen re-writes.
1200 baud seemed like heaven, and 2400 baud was where I started seeing full screen editors and graphics.
Sharing files was painful, I remember downloading a C compiler overnight. Surprised I had the credits and could keep the line up that long!
"300 baud is reading speed. Why would you need faster than that?" ;)
Hehe - 1200 Baud? You speedy
racer
-
if you want a real patience
test,
log in to the snail mail
Snobsoft
at 300 Baud:
telnet://snobsoft.de:6401.
Oh gosh.. thanks! I'll do so.. when
I
secure enough free time :D
BF2K+ wrote to BOGOMIPS <=-Many people have a fear of the command line interface and 16 colors.
I have also found this to be true. Seems like a lot of my sysop buds from the 80's don't want anything to do with BBSes anymore.
Matthew Munson wrote to BF2K+ <=-
I have also found this to be true. Seems like a lot of my sysop buds from the 80's don't want anything to do with BBSes anymore.
Many people have a fear of the command line interface and 16 colors.
Great, check this out...
How to post on Snobsoft:
https://quipzz.bplaced.net/how_to_post.txt
I though 14400 was slow then... but you beat my patience by far if you stood up to 1200. I presume delay on just simple ASCII typing and text receiving was a norm then.. can't even imagine how could you share something more than simple messages at that speed.
Maybe *YOU* don't. It's not like it was in the 90's, but there are still callers.
You got David Murray on your board nice. I have X16 myself but keep failing
Ya that's right. I get oh.. about.. oh 1000 callers a day, mostly from China, a d I'm sure they're all entertained by the 8 or 9 doors that everyone else does.
Mickey wrote to Gamgee <=-
Re: Re: Good to be back
By: Gamgee to MRO on Thu Mar 06 2025 08:04:52
Maybe *YOU* don't. It's not like it was in the 90's, but there are still callers.
Ya that's right. I get oh.. about.. oh 1000 callers a day, mostly from China, and I'm sure they're all entertained by the 8 or 9 doors that everyone else does.
Re: Re: Good to be back
By: Mickey to Gamgee on Sun Mar 09 2025 07:40 pm
1000 a day? Real callers? Some days I might get 1000 connections which are bots connecting quickly..
Great, check this out...
How to post on Snobsoft:
https://quipzz.bplaced.net/how_
to_
post.txt
Thanks for the hint. I just tried
and I
was worried it may be worse.
Not that bad experience actually.
Reminds me one of the Atari 8bit
board
regarding speed.
You got David Murray on your board
nice. I have X16 myself but keep
failing to connect it online with
Kevin
Williams' ESP32 based networking
card.
Anyway, Danke Schoen! [can't type
umlaut on my keyboard]
<cut>
In short - some things were
better
back then.
Agreed, and I think we were moreHere in Germany, there were never any
capable of self-regulating.
I remember when I started being
online
one of the first thing I discovered
was
the power of netiquette.
I believe there was already
modem
swapping in mid 80s, even
across
the big pond for C64 games, for
example. You had to have
patience
and someone
else who paid the extremely
high
phone bill :D But good hackers
could achieve such things back
then.
So I heard, I think all the blue boxYes, when it comes to pirate stuff,
and other phreaking/free calls was
primarily demanded by the need to
pirate for less phone bill call than
5
mins phone call order, payment and
shipment for the physical product.
Ah, that was you. I was about to
call you, 'Don't panic, hier ist der
sysop,' but you were already gone.
In any case, it's nice that you found
your way around. And thank you very
much for the new user entry. Feel
free to post something the next time
you log in. English is welcome.
Here in Germany, there were never any
problems with censorship in the 1980s
and early 90s. Hey, we live in a
democracy.
I believe you in the USA currently
have much more freedom of speech
than we do in Germany.
Re: Good to be back
By: Snobsoft to MRO on Fri Feb 28 2025 09:32 am
I've also seen a number of people who sign up and visit just once and never again. Or maybe they'll play a door game like LORD for a little bit and then stop.
During the BBS heyday, BBSes and dialup modems was the technology we had at the time. I think most people probably don't care as much about the technology, but more about there being ways of connecting online in general somewhere, and being easy to do so.
I still think BBSing is pretty cool though, and it was pretty cool that we had modems, which allowed computers to communicate with each other over phone lines, which enabled a lot of things. And as others have said, there is significantly less spam & ads on BBSes compared to social networks, which is nice.
Nightfox
---
Synchronet Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
Same here. I have an average of 6 calls per day. Someone downloads messages via NNTP several times a week, a few file transfers during the week, a couple local messages posted per week, and LORD and TEOS are the dominant doors being played. I enjoy playing scrabble daily via my BBS and 2 other boards. I think late 2001 is when I ended dial up and took board from power BBS to synchronet and telnet. Some of my regular users have been with my BBS since the late 80s. For a few years I just ran the BBS for messages and got back into door's more recently. I enjoy reading these message boards a lot. Thank you all for still being here.
Re: Good to be back
By: Rixter to Nightfox on Wed Mar 12 2025 02:37:22
Hi, Rixter.
Same here. I have an average of 6 calls per day. Someone downloads messag via NNTP several times a week, a few file transfers during the week, a couple local messages posted per week, and LORD and TEOS are the dominant doors being played. I enjoy playing scrabble daily via my BBS and 2 other boards. I think late 2001 is when I ended dial up and took board from pow BBS to synchronet and telnet. Some of my regular users have been with my since the late 80s. For a few years I just ran the BBS for messages and g back into door's more recently. I enjoy reading these message boards a l Thank you all for still being here.
Yeah, I know not that many people use BBS but that's half the appeal for me. It's very "intimate".
In fact when I go on MRC and there are more than half a dozen people I find a bit much and usually bail out :)
BobW
Do you run a BBS Bob?
Re: Good to be back
By: Rixter to Bob Worm on Thu Mar 13 2025 09:52:59
Hi, Rixter.
Do you run a BBS Bob?
I'm one of the tiny minority who use BBSes daily but don't have one of my ow >
I have thought about setting one up but what would I bring to the party? I'm > not any kind of artist, I only code when there's a job to be done and I don' > really have a unique theme I could offer to the world.
BobW
I believe you in the USA
currently
have much more freedom of
speech
than we do in Germany.
... I'd say you'd be surprised.
BTW: When's your next Snobsoft visit?
:D
people left bbsing behind for good. there's other things they'd
rather do.
I didn't think I'd shut my system down, but when I realized I was just running it for myself it was an easy decision.
telnet://bbs.roonsbbs.hu:1212 <<=-
You guys are talking about history far beyond my generation ;)
I started shortly with modem to have dialup for the internet in the mid 90s.
I though 14400 was slow then... but you beat my patience by far if you stood up to 1200. I presume delay on just simple ASCII typing and text receiving was a norm then.. can't even imagine how could you share something more than simple messages at that speed.
I presume all that was before people invented files could be shared?
-h1
... Xerox Alto was the thing. Anything after we use is just a mere copy.
Sysop: | KrAAB |
---|---|
Location: | Donna, TX |
Users: | 4 |
Nodes: | 20 (0 / 20) |
Uptime: | 31:33:53 |
Calls: | 494 |
Files: | 2,467 |
D/L today: |
52 files (10,000K bytes) |
Messages: | 44,323 |