Re: Re: New house, who dis?
By: Gamgee to deon on Thu Jun 19 2025 08:12 am
Howdy,
I think the point that Nightfox (and others) are trying to make is....
WHY use a Zone number that is already widely known to be in use? What actual benefit does that provide you, when there are literally thousands
of other available (unused) Zone numbers?
Zone 12 is in wide use? (Yes, 10 and 1 are.)
Anyway, the reason I use existing zone numbers is to test that my mailer can actually work fine in a 5D environment, especially with downstream systems that might be only 4D capabile.
Nobody has exclusive rights/control over a zone number, so I also wanted to make my mailer robust in that area - in case its needed. Its probably not needed since this is a hobby that is unlikely needing that level of scalability anymore.
I've enjoyed building something that enables FTN to be used with new transports, new packet formats, new addressing methods, while supporting the stoneage architecture that some people might want to run. Its an itch I wanted to scratch, so I scratched it - even though some said it was pointless.
...ëîåï
---
þ Synchronet þ AnsiTEX bringing back videotex but with ANSI