"Aaron, you have 180 days to take action. Hi Aaron,Your Facebook account has been suspended. This is because your account, or activity on it, doesn't follo
our Community Standards on account integrity."

Have you ever been the least bit curious about what it is that you are
doing that doesn't follow their Community Standards? I don't know anyone
else who has these problems. I suspect it is either that they suspect your actions make you likely a bot, or that possibly someone else is trying to
hack your account.


* SLMR 2.1a * Sir! Romulan Warbird decloaking off th #%NO CARRIER
--- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

A couple things I want to point out about this Facebook suspension that I left
out:

1) If I "violated their community standards" then why are they inviting me to share a video selfie with them? That will make them forgive me whatever horrible thing I did wrong?

2) What does a video selfie even prove? If I go to a store to buy beer, they aren't going to accept a video selfie as ID. So what gives?

Their elitism (whether it's automated or not) disgusts me. And I didn't do anything wrong. I get on Facebook and I watch the reels that they show me and then I sign off, and today was no different than any other day.

Video selfies are for proving you are not a bot. Something you are doing
makes them think you are a bot.

Something I left out of my last message but just dawned on me... it could
also be your IP Address. I had some issues with mine because a web crawler linked to a company that was trying to sell me their virus software
red-flagged my IPA because their crawler found compressed files here. As "here" includes a BBS, that would make sense.

I blocked their crawlers and also removed access to the file areas for
guests, and the problem eventually cleared up. I didn't want to stop
guests from being able to download old DOS programs but, for the time
being, that is how it is.


* SLMR 2.1a * EBCDIC: Erase Backup Chew Disk Ignite Cards
--- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

Aaron Thomas wrote to Mike Powell <=-

IMO: They shouldn't care what you use as a profile photo, as long as
it's not offensive or containing nudity. But obviously I don't make the rules.

I've seen people use non-selfies as profile photos. So that's not the problem.

I get the feeling that big tech is building their own database on us
and taking inventory on people. I have no doubt that they get
satisfaction from controlling people. They even said "When you take the selfie video we will ask you to turn your head in certain directions to get a view from different angles." If that's not a sick desire to
control people, then I don't know what is.

I think that Facebook simply has you on a list of people to harass.


... Honesty pays, but not enough for some.
___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

--- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
* Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)

get a view from different angles." If that's not a sick desire to control people, then I don't know what is.

I think that Facebook simply has you on a list of people to harass.

It's some kind of sick elitist game. Kinda like "New User Voting." (They voted "no" on me apparently!)

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
* Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/200)

Have you ever been the least bit curious about what it is that you are doing that doesn't follow their Community Standards? I don't know anyone
else who has these problems. I suspect it is either that they suspect your actions make you likely a bot, or that possibly someone else is trying to hack your account.

The only dishonest thing I've done on Facebook is my profile photo is a pictur
of me from about 10 years ago, but I am fussy about photos of myself and I think it's a good photo, and I think I still look the same.

Not saying you are doing things that are "dishonest," just that you might
be doing things that would suggest bot behavior.

IMO: They shouldn't care what you use as a profile photo, as long as it's not offensive or containing nudity. But obviously I don't make the rules.

Many people use photos that they are not even in... like photos of the
family dog... so your photo is probably not the problem. As Kurt pointed out, what is likely getting you in trouble with account #2 is that they've figured out you are trying to skirt the ban on account #1.


* SLMR 2.1a * A seminar on Time Travel will be held 2 weeks ago....
--- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

To me, the botlike behaviors are: people who post photoshopped photos of themselves, people who post photos of celebrities, people who send friend requests to people they don't know.

Right? I'm not like that. So who knows.

Those, especially the last one, are things I would classify as possible bot behavior. They may have others I am not aware of.


* SLMR 2.1a * The bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.
--- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-

It's some kind of sick elitist game.

That's the only kind of game that they play.


... When your IQ hits 21, SELL!!
___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

--- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
* Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)

Many people use photos that they are not even in... like photos of the family dog... so your photo is probably not the problem. As Kurt pointed out, what is likely getting you in trouble with account #2 is that
they've figured out you are trying to skirt the ban on account #1.

I'm guilty of that, but the ban on account #1 was the same thing; they did it without any justification that I can relate to.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
* Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/200)

Many people use photos that they are not even in... like photos of the family dog... so your photo is probably not the problem. As Kurt pointed out, what is likely getting you in trouble with account #2 is that they've figured out you are trying to skirt the ban on account #1.

I'm guilty of that, but the ban on account #1 was the same thing; they did it without any justification that I can relate to.

Did you ever send them proof for account #1?


* SLMR 2.1a * Why do we have training bras? What can we teach them?
--- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

Don Vally wrote to KURT WEISKE <=-

Ha ha - wait, was that supposed to be funny? Why would we need an AI
to help us understand? Wait, I might need one to chime in on your
comment...

Wow, that one went way over your head.

Most things do. ;)


* SLMR 2.1a * Bureaucrats cut red tape--lengthwise.
--- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

Many people use photos that they are not even in... like photos of family dog... so your photo is probably not the problem. As Kurt po out, what is likely getting you in trouble with account #2 is that they've figured out you are trying to skirt the ban on account #1.

I'm guilty of that, but the ban on account #1 was the same thing; they d without any justification that I can relate to.

Did you ever send them proof for account #1?

No - they were demanding that I upload "a verification selfie."

(Now they've devolved into "get on the webcam and perform for us.")

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
* Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/200)