• Re: I watched the 'talk'

    From Shawn Highfield@1:154/700 to Aaron Thomas on Monday, March 03, 2025 06:01:41
    Hi Aaron,
    In a message to August Abolins you wrote:

    What's wrong with dressing professional? If I dressed like Zelensky
    and went to a job interview they'd laugh at me.

    Last week someone came to a job interview at my company in sweat pants.
    Yes, he was hired. We explain that once he's hired if he comes to work
    in sweat pants he will be sent home to change and he will not be paid until
    he comes back in clothing that is approved. (Everything except sweat pants)

    Shawn

    ... Hey, look! A completely new undocumented fea&%$#*@ NO CARRIER


    * SeM. 2.26 * Dirty Ole' Town
    --- SBBSecho 3.23-Linux
    * Origin: _thePharcyde telnet://bbs.pharcyde.org (Wisconsin) (1:154/700)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:342/201 to Shawn Highfield on Monday, March 03, 2025 06:54:20
    and went to a job interview they'd laugh at me.

    Last week someone came to a job interview at my company in sweat pants. Yes, he was hired. We explain that once he's hired if he comes to work
    in sweat pants he will be sent home to change and he will not be paid until he comes back in clothing that is approved. (Everything except sweat pants)

    People are too nice in Canada. That's like telling illegal immigrants "It's ok that you entered illegally, but from here on out, we expect you to do everything else the legal way, or else we'll send you a warning letter."

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to KURT WEISKE on Monday, March 03, 2025 12:10:00
    Another a-hole is the one who asked Z "why don't you wear a
    suit.. as a sign of respect.. etc".

    Seeing as Musk ran a meeting over Trump in the oval office looking like someone whose luggage had been lost...

    Is that the same one where Musk's kid leaned over and told Trump to shut up
    and that he wasn't the real President? That kid owned him.


    * SLMR 2.1a * Music is the only sensual pleasure without vice.
    --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Alan Beck@3:772/220 to Aaron Thomas on Wednesday, March 05, 2025 02:17:30
    Yes, we are a polite bunch.

    We don't put of with 'Bullies".

    Bullied is one the feelings we have right now.

    An American friend of mine listened to a support call I had and not only was she amazed with how I dealt with the person but how far I got.

    She tried it and was amazed.

    If anything I said offended you, then I apologize.

    :- )

    Alan

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
    * Origin: Family BBS: Telent Familybbs.ddns.net:23 (3:772/220)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:342/201 to Alan Beck on Tuesday, March 04, 2025 08:16:48
    Yes, we are a polite bunch.

    We don't put of with 'Bullies".

    Bullied is one the feelings we have right now.

    When I was a kid I used to sit on the bus with a stinky kid. Bullies called him "Stinky Steven." But Steve was a nice guy, so I sat with him anyway. Steve's stink wasn't hurting me.

    Like Steve, Canada is a nice guy also. But the odor of drugs, illegal immigrants, and an unfair trade balance is actually hurting my country, and I
    can still smell it even when I get off the bus.

    I don't blame the Canadian people. Sometimes we inadvertently elect bad politicians here in the states also, and that's why some of these odors haven't been dissolved already. You need a leader who will stand up for Canada the same way the Trump stands up for the USA.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)
  • From Kurt Weiske@1:218/1 to Mike Powell on Tuesday, March 04, 2025 07:58:59
    Mike Powell wrote to KURT WEISKE <=-

    Is that the same one where Musk's kid leaned over and told Trump to
    shut up and that he wasn't the real President? That kid owned him.

    Out of the mouths of babes...come the truth.



    --- MultiMail/Win v0.52
    * Origin: http://realitycheckbbs.org | tomorrow's retro tech (1:218/1)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to Kurt Weiske on Tuesday, March 04, 2025 19:14:00
    Kurt Weiske wrote to Mike Powell <=-

    Is that the same one where Musk's kid leaned over and told Trump to
    shut up and that he wasn't the real President? That kid owned him.

    Out of the mouths of babes...come the truth.

    I wonder if that kid realizes what he got away with? If he was an adult,
    he might have been disappeared by now.


    ... "Mmmmmmmm.....chocolate."
    --- MultiMail/DOS v0.52
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Rob Mccart@1:2320/105 to SHAWN HIGHFIELD on Wednesday, March 05, 2025 01:16:00
    Last week someone came to a job interview at my company in sweat pants.
    >Yes, he was hired. We explain that once he's hired if he comes to work
    >in sweat pants he will be sent home to change and he will not be paid until
    >he comes back in clothing that is approved. (Everything except sweat pants)

    Ha.. that reminded me of my first longer term job when I was still in
    high school at a grocery store. I had a summer job welding at a steel
    plant and one day while I was changing a welding rod so had ahold of
    it, lighting hit the high tension wires outside and blew out every
    electric motor in the plant and knocked me right off my feet..

    That cost me my job since they had to shut the place down for too
    long for me to go back so when I saw the help wanted sign up in the
    grocery store I asked about it. I filled out the application and
    then the store manager came out to talk to me immediately.

    He looked at how I was dressed and said, I can see you ride a motorcycle.
    Whay happens when it rains? "I get wet.." I answered..
    He seemed happy enough with that answer but as I was leaving he said
    to me, you're going to need a white shirt, black pants (not leather)
    and get your hair cut.. I ended up working for that company both part
    time when in school and full time later for about 7 years.

    ---
    * SLMR Rob * If not for lousy help, we wouldn't have any at all!
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to AARON THOMAS on Wednesday, March 05, 2025 10:21:00
    Like Steve, Canada is a nice guy also. But the odor of drugs, illegal immigrants, and an unfair trade balance is actually hurting my country, and I can still smell it even when I get off the bus.

    Drugs and illegal immigrants are a smoke screen.

    As for unfair trade, as it has been pointed out, it was Donald Trump who
    signed the current trade deal with Canada and he called it the best deal ever done.

    If it is so unfair, maybe he should not have signed it and then lied about
    it being the best ever?

    I don't blame the Canadian people. Sometimes we inadvertently elect bad politicians here in the states also, and that's why some of these odors
    aven'
    been dissolved already. You need a leader who will stand up for Canada the
    am
    way the Trump stands up for the USA.

    Trump is making Trudeau look good which is a difficult task considering the beating Trudeau was taking before this.


    * SLMR 2.1a * HaHaHa! Yuk, Yuk. Snort. Harumph.
    --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to KURT WEISKE on Wednesday, March 05, 2025 10:13:00
    Zelensky is no slouch when it comes to wit, but his visit was
    weighed by the serious burden of his country and people under
    attack - I could imagine that humour and levity would be hard
    to maintain at all times. But Vance and Trump were
    disrespectful pricks in this situation.

    Two things stuck out at me - When Zelenskyy said, in pretty good English
    that if you don't deal with Russia in Ukraine, you'll deal with them at
    your doorstep, and it felt like Trump saw that as an opening to distort
    that and go on the offensive, saying "You don't tell me what to do".
    That seemed like an intentional escalation, not a misunderstanding.

    I actually felt like Trump jumped on that because Trump didn't want those listening (i.e. us!) to be worrying about his buddy Putin, so he deflected it quickly.

    Secondly, when Trump described Zelenskyy's strategy as "not good
    business", it rang hollow. Governing a people is *not* a business.

    True. If you try to treat it like one, it becomes increasingly difficult
    to govern.


    * SLMR 2.1a * Money is the root of all evil. Send $250 for more info.
    --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to KURT WEISKE on Wednesday, March 05, 2025 10:15:00
    And, the Down Jones average is down almost 1000 points in the last few
    days leading up to the tariffs. Interesting, planning your stock-killing
    political move on the day of your State of the Union address.

    It closed yesterday being down over 1300 points in two days.


    * SLMR 2.1a * Any given program will expand to fill available memory
    --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:342/201 to Mike Powell on Wednesday, March 05, 2025 09:13:58
    As for unfair trade, as it has been pointed out, it was Donald Trump who signed the current trade deal with Canada and he called it the best deal ever done.

    USMCA failed to address the trade imbalance. It was passed through congress, which probably means that it wasn't allowed to address the trade imbalance, because congress would never deal with an issue like that.

    Trump is making Trudeau look good which is a difficult task considering the beating Trudeau was taking before this.

    I don't see it that way. Smart Canadians probably don't see it that way either. It doesn't erase the damage that Trudeau has done to Canada.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)
  • From Rob Mccart@1:2320/105 to AARON THOMAS on Thursday, March 06, 2025 01:41:00
    Like Steve, Canada is a nice guy also. But the odor of drugs, illegal immigra
    >, and an unfair trade balance is actually hurting my country, and I
    >can still smell it even when I get off the bus.

    Don't believe much of what Trump is saying, making up.. whatever..

    The trade imbalance, if you remove the Oil you buy from us at 20%
    lower than world prices, it's actually a trade Surplus for you.

    And the Fentanyl problem, less than 1/2 of 1% coming into your country
    comes through Canada, and you wouldn't believe the tons of drugs we
    stop coming across the border FROM the USA, not to mention illegal guns.

    No border as long as ours can be sealed tight, but we do try, and I
    will grant that it needed some upgrades which we are doing now.

    Illegal immigrants? Can't be too many unless you consider Canadians
    to be illegal immigrants. A few people fly into our country and
    then sneak across the border but it's nothing like the thousands
    coming in through Mexico.

    Trust me.. the person that will hurt the USA more than anyone
    else is your president. Tariffs are nothing but a tax on you,
    as well as us, and he is damaging both of our economies.

    ---
    * SLMR Rob * Tact - The art of thinking twice before saying nothing
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Rob Mccart@1:2320/105 to KURT WEISKE on Thursday, March 06, 2025 02:15:00
    Two things stuck out at me - When Zelenskyy said, in pretty good English
    >that if you don't deal with Russia in Ukraine, you'll deal with them at
    >your doorstep, and it felt like Trump saw that as an opening to distort
    >that and go on the offensive, saying "You don't tell me what to do".
    >That seemed like an intentional escalation, not a misunderstanding.

    Secondly, when Trump described Zelenskyy's strategy as "not good
    >business", it rang hollow. Governing a people is *not* a business.

    No, and if you let more powerful countries just walk in and take
    over smaller countries, eventually they will get bigger than you
    and you might be next. Everyone is pussy footing around worrying
    about starting WW3 but that attitude has left Ukraine with nothing
    but financial aid. Granted, a lot of it, but if you play at an
    extended little war, it costs a lot more than a bigger fast one.

    ---
    * SLMR Rob * "Pieces of Nine! Pieces of Nine! Rawk!" (Parroty error)
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Rob Mccart@1:2320/105 to KURT WEISKE on Thursday, March 06, 2025 01:57:00
    And, the Dow Jones average is down almost 1000 points in the last few
    > days leading up to the tariffs. Interesting, planning your stock-killing
    > political move on the day of your State of the Union address.

    "Bold move, Cotton, let's see how it plays out for 'em..."

    It would be funny if our country wasn't in the balance.

    Both of our countries are. Tariffs only put money into govennment
    hands at increased prices and lost business (lost jobs) for the
    regular working people.

    It sounds like Trump is getting more negative feed back all the time
    from big business in the USA, not to mention most State Governors.

    I guess that's why he replaced most of the govenment with his
    flunkies or someone would be telling him he's, lets be a polite
    Canadian and say 'Wrong'.. B)

    ---
    * SLMR Rob * Texas: home of beautiful horses and fast women!
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to AARON THOMAS on Thursday, March 06, 2025 08:52:00
    As for unfair trade, as it has been pointed out, it was Donald Trump who signed the current trade deal with Canada and he called it the best deal ever done.

    USMCA failed to address the trade imbalance. It was passed through congress, which probably means that it wasn't allowed to address the trade imbalance, because congress would never deal with an issue like that.

    Trump signed it, *after* it had been through Congress, and said it was the
    best deal ever done. Certainly he didn't *lie* to us about that?

    Trump is making Trudeau look good which is a difficult task considering the beating Trudeau was taking before this.

    I don't see it that way. Smart Canadians probably don't see it that way
    ither
    It doesn't erase the damage that Trudeau has done to Canada.

    There are Canadians on FIDO who were bad mouthing Trudeau right up until
    Trump started slinging BS. Now not nearly so much.


    * SLMR 2.1a * Sorry, the Dog ate my Blue Wave packet.
    --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to ROB MCCART on Thursday, March 06, 2025 08:44:00
    Trust me.. the person that will hurt the USA more than anyone
    else is your president. Tariffs are nothing but a tax on you,
    as well as us, and he is damaging both of our economies.

    One aggrevating thing about the retaliatory tarrifs is that they are
    targeted at "red" states which are mostly always red. They are not the
    areas that decided the election. States like North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin... those are the states that were toss-ups that
    all went red this time.

    I will believe that Canada really means business when they start tarriffing automobiles, for example, and not just motorcycles.


    * SLMR 2.1a * I wish life had a scroll-back buffer.
    --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Kurt Weiske@1:218/1 to Mike Powell on Thursday, March 06, 2025 07:00:54
    Mike Powell wrote to KURT WEISKE <=-

    I actually felt like Trump jumped on that because Trump didn't want
    those listening (i.e. us!) to be worrying about his buddy Putin, so he deflected it quickly.

    That makes sense. A typical straw man argument to conveniently redirect
    the conversation.

    Secondly, when Trump described Zelenskyy's strategy as "not good
    business", it rang hollow. Governing a people is *not* a business.

    True. If you try to treat it like one, it becomes increasingly
    difficult to govern.

    As someone who has bankrupted six businesses, I'm loathe to take
    business advice from him. I don't want him making the USA his seventh.





    --- MultiMail/Win v0.52
    * Origin: http://realitycheckbbs.org | tomorrow's retro tech (1:218/1)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:342/201 to Rob Mccart on Thursday, March 06, 2025 08:12:40
    The trade imbalance, if you remove the Oil you buy from us at 20%
    lower than world prices, it's actually a trade Surplus for you.

    In that case, I'll assume that Trump refers to what the ratio will look like after we start drilling our own oil (which is one of his plans.)

    And the Fentanyl problem, less than 1/2 of 1% coming into your country comes through Canada, and you wouldn't believe the tons of drugs we
    stop coming across the border FROM the USA, not to mention illegal guns.

    This sounds to me like the USA & Canada need to work together to combat the issue then. I don't want drugs coming in from Canada, and I don't want drugs going out to Canada either. The same goes for illegal immigrants and/or other criminals.

    It's my understanding that Canada's liberal party is loyal to China, and part of being loyal to China means to not interfere with China's opium/precursor sales to American junkies.

    "Everything we discussed has been leaked to the papers. That is not appropriate."

    No border as long as ours can be sealed tight, but we do try, and I
    will grant that it needed some upgrades which we are doing now.

    The rivers should make it somewhat easier. The St. Lawrence River is significantly deeper and wider compared to the Rio Grande. Onlya very athletic person would be able to swim all the way across the St. Lawrence.

    The land borders might be more difficult to enforce, but whatever it takes, we should do it. If we've got 3 trillion dollars for DEI, then we should have another 3 trillion for border enforcement.

    Trust me.. the person that will hurt the USA more than anyone
    else is your president. Tariffs are nothing but a tax on you,
    as well as us, and he is damaging both of our economies.

    I just don't see the damage yet. I see all the alarms and warnings, but just no damage. Kinda like global warming: it don't feel very hot yet.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:342/201 to Mike Powell on Thursday, March 06, 2025 08:21:32
    USMCA failed to address the trade imbalance. It was passed through congr which probably means that it wasn't allowed to address the trade imbalan because congress would never deal with an issue like that.

    Trump signed it, *after* it had been through Congress, and said it was
    the best deal ever done. Certainly he didn't *lie* to us about that?

    It probably was the best deal ever done, but now it's time for even better.

    I don't see it that way. Smart Canadians probably don't see it that way
    ither
    It doesn't erase the damage that Trudeau has done to Canada.

    There are Canadians on FIDO who were bad mouthing Trudeau right up until Trump started slinging BS. Now not nearly so much.

    That shows how triggered people get by the media. It's a mistake. I recommend getting triggered by actual results that we can see, hear, and touch.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)
  • From Rob Mccart@1:2320/105 to MIKE POWELL on Saturday, March 08, 2025 01:49:00
    One aggrevating thing about the retaliatory tarrifs is that they are
    >targeted at "red" states which are mostly always red. They are not the
    >areas that decided the election. States like North Carolina, Pennsylvania,
    >Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin... those are the states that were toss-ups that
    >all went red this time.

    I will believe that Canada really means business when they start tarriffing
    >automobiles, for example, and not just motorcycles.

    I'm not up on the exact details regarding auto sales but a huge number
    of cars were just shipped across the border to beat the tariffs that
    Trump is putting on them, or will.. or might..
    Estimates seem to be if the tariffs go through they will add between
    $3000 and $12,000 to the cost of a new vehicle, average about $6000.

    I suppose if we were smart we would just start buying just vehicles that
    we make in Canada to avoid the tariffs altogether. I'd have to check
    but obviously the variety of vehicles available that way would not be
    very wide, which would obviously be a problem. More likely a lot of
    people will put off buying new cars longer than usual in the hopes that
    once Trump is gone this crap will come to an end.

    It is opening up trade across Canada though. They are working at
    getting rid of the trade barriers between provinces so we can
    more easily buy Canadian made than American made. They figure
    that will boost our sales in Canada by about $200 Billion.

    Oh, and they are working on a pipeline, East to West here. We talked
    about refineries the other day and apparently we do have refineries
    here, but they are all to the East and the bulk of our oil to the
    West and it was easier to pipe it to the USA than Truck it across
    Canada, which now may change if this goes through.

    ---
    * SLMR Rob * (A)bort, (R)etry, or (I)nfluence with lollies?
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Rob Mccart@1:2320/105 to AARON THOMAS on Saturday, March 08, 2025 01:46:00
    The trade imbalance, if you remove the Oil you buy from us at 20%
    lower than world prices, it's actually a trade Surplus for you.

    In that case, I'll assume that Trump refers to what the ratio will look like
    >er we start drilling our own oil (which is one of his plans.)

    Yes, and you've always had the option of using your own oil but an
    intelligent country would use as much of a finite resource like oil
    as they can get at a decent pricefrom other countries to save their
    resources for when outside supplies start to run out. You have a
    huge number of oil wells that are found, and then just capped for
    future use. Using that oil may cause future problems but will bring
    you some new employment. It's a bit of an immediate gratification
    and not worrying about the future as much.

    And the Fentanyl problem, less than 1/2 of 1% coming into your country comes through Canada, and you wouldn't believe the tons of drugs we
    stop coming across the border FROM the USA, not to mention illegal guns.

    This sounds to me like the USA & Canada need to work together to combat the i
    >e then. I don't want drugs coming in from Canada, and I don't want drugs goin
    >ut to Canada either. The same goes for illegal immigrants and/or other crimin

    This is true. It should almost be a single service with enforcers from
    both countries.. Just as a sidebar, today they found 4 illegal immigrants
    who had entered into Canada (Quebec) from the USA, 2 adults and 2 kids
    who were on the verge of freezing to death when found, literally just
    huddled together waiting to die. A lot of people have no idea what to
    expect up here since the vast majority of immigrants, legal or not,
    come from much warmer climates.

    It's my understanding that Canada's liberal party is loyal to China, and part
    > being loyal to China means to not interfere with China's opium/precursor sal
    >to American junkies.

    We definitely do some business with China but we couldn't be further
    away from 'loyal' to them. We often condition sales on them improving
    human rights and a number of times they have tried to influence our
    elections so our relationship with them is very precarious.

    No border as long as ours can be sealed tight, but we do try, and I
    > RM> will grant that it needed some upgrades which we are doing now.

    The rivers should make it somewhat easier. The St. Lawrence River is signific
    >ly deeper and wider compared to the Rio Grande. Onlya very athletic person wo
    > be able to swim all the way across the St. Lawrence.

    Yes, although the St Lawrence and the great lakes only make up a small
    portion of our border, about 1/3 of the border between our countries,
    and much of the rest of it is just forest or farmland, difficult to
    control without building a wall, but fortunately not ll that popular
    as an area to cross the border..

    Trust me.. the person that will hurt the USA more than anyone
    else is your president. Tariffs are nothing but a tax on you,
    as well as us, and he is damaging both of our economies.

    I just don't see the damage yet. I see all the alarms and warnings, but just
    >damage. Kinda like global warming: it don't feel very hot yet.

    No, actual damage isn't obvious yet other than thousands of Canadians
    so angry that they will not be spending their tourist dollars in
    the USA this year and people looking where their groceries come from
    and buying Canadian now, even if it costs more.

    But we are still just dealing with threats and the tariffs keep getting postponed, most likely because of huge corporations and government
    leaders in your country trying to stop them.

    If the 25% across the board tariffs come in they estimate it will
    cost Canada more than a million jobs and the estimate is 1.9 million
    American jobs plus higher prices on almost everything. The numbers
    they came up with here is annually in Canada we will spend an extra
    $1900 or so on purchases and about $1300 for the average American,
    and the average car price there is expected to go up by between
    $3000 and $12,000 depending on model. They seem to suggest $6000
    as an average.

    Economic damage is estimated at over $240 Billion but, an interesting
    thing that's cropped up, we are working at removing trade barriers
    between out Provinces and the estimate is that that will generate
    roughly $200 Billion in added business, which of course would be
    mostly for things we currently buy from the USA.

    Some sources say that the tariffs will be on more than a $Trillion
    of your imports. If the tariffs are at 25%, that will put an extra
    $250 Billion into your government coffers.. I wonder how much of
    that will trickle down to the average working person, especially
    the ones who lose their job over it?

    What Trump seems to want to do might eventually benefit your
    country, but there would be a lot of pain for possibly decades
    and it's likely that your next president will undo most of it.

    The saddest thing is, not only have our countries been good friends
    for many decades but we could always rely on good quality products
    compared to buying from especially Asia. Not sure about Europe..

    ---
    * SLMR Rob * What we have here is a failure to communicate
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to ROB MCCART on Saturday, March 08, 2025 09:42:00
    I will believe that Canada really means business when they start
    arriffing
    >automobiles, for example, and not just motorcycles.

    I'm not up on the exact details regarding auto sales but a huge number
    of cars were just shipped across the border to beat the tariffs that
    Trump is putting on them, or will.. or might..
    Estimates seem to be if the tariffs go through they will add between
    $3000 and $12,000 to the cost of a new vehicle, average about $6000.

    Yeah, Trump seems real wishy-washy in that. Maybe because the Dow went down over 1300 points the first two days of this week.

    I meant that Canada, if they mean business, should start tariffing American made autos. There are a bunch of "red states" that make those, including
    the states that went red just for this election.

    I suppose if we were smart we would just start buying just vehicles that
    we make in Canada to avoid the tariffs altogether. I'd have to check
    but obviously the variety of vehicles available that way would not be
    very wide, which would obviously be a problem. More likely a lot of
    people will put off buying new cars longer than usual in the hopes that
    once Trump is gone this crap will come to an end.

    Funny because supposedly, per those defending the tariffs, part of the reasoning behind them was that we are importing too many "American" cars
    from Canada. ;)

    Mike

    * SLMR 2.1a * Stupidity has no limits, genius does.
    --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Kurt Weiske@1:218/1 to Rob Mccart on Saturday, March 08, 2025 09:38:02
    Rob Mccart wrote to MIKE POWELL <=-

    It is opening up trade across Canada though. They are working at
    getting rid of the trade barriers between provinces so we can
    more easily buy Canadian made than American made. They figure
    that will boost our sales in Canada by about $200 Billion.

    Oh, and they are working on a pipeline, East to West here. We talked
    about refineries the other day and apparently we do have refineries
    here, but they are all to the East and the bulk of our oil to the
    West and it was easier to pipe it to the USA than Truck it across
    Canada, which now may change if this goes through.

    Interesting. The article I read calling out US refineries refining
    Canadian oil inferred that Canada lacked the capacity to refine, not
    the transportation logistics.

    A global commerce model with open trading partners is/was a good thing,
    but it requires all parties to act in the best interests of everyone.
    One crony capitalist/isolationist/megalomaniac/grifter and the whole
    model falls apart - as we're seeing now.






    --- MultiMail/Win v0.52
    * Origin: http://realitycheckbbs.org | tomorrow's retro tech (1:218/1)
  • From Kurt Weiske@1:218/1 to Mike Powell on Saturday, March 08, 2025 09:38:02
    Mike Powell wrote to ROB MCCART <=-

    I meant that Canada, if they mean business, should start tariffing American made autos. There are a bunch of "red states" that make
    those, including the states that went red just for this election.

    A friend of mine in Toronto sent me a picture of a coffee shop menu
    with a drink called a "Canadiano". :)

    I suppose if we were smart we would just start buying just vehicles that
    we make in Canada to avoid the tariffs altogether. I'd have to check
    but obviously the variety of vehicles available that way would not be
    very wide, which would obviously be a problem. More likely a lot of
    people will put off buying new cars longer than usual in the hopes that
    once Trump is gone this crap will come to an end.

    Funny because supposedly, per those defending the tariffs, part of the reasoning behind them was that we are importing too many "American"
    cars from Canada. ;)

    In my limited time in Canada recently, it seemed like most of the cars
    were Japanese/Korean, with older American cars in the mix. Mind you,
    this was BC where it's easier to get imported cars from the east
    without having to transport them across provinces.

    Back in Detroit's heyday, it must have been convenient being right
    across the border - I remember reading about Canadian-branded GM cars
    in the 1980s. Now, with American cars being built everywhere, not so
    much.



    ... Adding on
    --- MultiMail/Win v0.52
    * Origin: http://realitycheckbbs.org | tomorrow's retro tech (1:218/1)
  • From Kurt Weiske@1:218/1 to Mike Powell on Saturday, March 08, 2025 10:00:24
    Re: Re: I watched the 'talk'
    By: Kurt Weiske to Mike Powell on Sat Mar 08 2025 09:38 am

    Back in Detroit's heyday, it must have been convenient being right across th border - I remember reading about Canadian-branded GM cars in the 1980s. Now with American cars being built everywhere, not so much.

    Responding to my own message - I know Ford built engines in Windsor, they had a "351 Windsor" and a "351 Cleveland" engine back in the early 70s.
    --- SBBSecho 3.23-Win32
    * Origin: http://realitycheckbbs.org | tomorrow's retro tech (1:218/1)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:342/200 to Rob Mccart on Saturday, March 08, 2025 14:31:02
    Yes, and you've always had the option of using your own oil but an intelligent country would use as much of a finite resource like oil
    as they can get at a decent pricefrom other countries to save their

    There's a mystery about the prices here. The price right now is 3x what it was back in 2016. If buying oil from Canada isn't solving that issue, then I'm assuming that drilling our own oil will solve it. Even if it doesn't bring the price down, it should at least solve the problem of being dependent on another country.

    This is true. It should almost be a single service with enforcers from both countries.. Just as a sidebar, today they found 4 illegal immigrants who had entered into Canada (Quebec) from the USA, 2 adults and 2 kids

    Part of the problem is caring too much about the illegal immigrants. The children could have been kidnapped, and you'd have no clue. And the adults could have have murdered dozens of people in Peru, and you'd never find out.

    No, actual damage isn't obvious yet other than thousands of Canadians
    so angry that they will not be spending their tourist dollars in
    the USA this year and people looking where their groceries come from
    and buying Canadian now, even if it costs more.

    But this shouldn't come as any surprise. Trump has been very vocal about everything he intended to do all throughout his campaign. To panic now is like saying "I never saw this coming."

    If the 25% across the board tariffs come in they estimate it will
    cost Canada more than a million jobs and the estimate is 1.9 million American jobs plus higher prices on almost everything. The numbers

    If the crystal ball is correct, then these results should serve as a wake-up call to Canadians who believe that it's wise to depend on other countries.

    Some sources say that the tariffs will be on more than a $Trillion
    of your imports. If the tariffs are at 25%, that will put an extra
    $250 Billion into your government coffers.. I wonder how much of
    that will trickle down to the average working person, especially
    the ones who lose their job over it?

    Not sure, but I will take this as a hint that it's time for me to start preparing for these things.

    What Trump seems to want to do might eventually benefit your
    country, but there would be a lot of pain for possibly decades
    and it's likely that your next president will undo most of it.

    Something that Trump and I have in common is that we're positive thinkers. I think that the next president will double down on Trump's executive orders. I'm hoping for one Trump's sons to be the next president.

    The saddest thing is, not only have our countries been good friends
    for many decades but we could always rely on good quality products compared to buying from especially Asia. Not sure about Europe..

    Yea, I don't trust food from Europe. We have a discount grocery story called "Aldi" that sells cheap European foods, and I used to eat it, but I'm concerned about the food safety standards not being to my satisfaction.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/200)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to KURT WEISKE on Sunday, March 09, 2025 09:34:00
    In my limited time in Canada recently, it seemed like most of the cars
    were Japanese/Korean, with older American cars in the mix. Mind you,
    this was BC where it's easier to get imported cars from the east
    without having to transport them across provinces.

    They are Japanese, but were they actually made there? Toyota has a huge
    plant (maybe their NA HQ?) just down the road from here. Honda has several
    in the region, too. There are several large auto parts plants in the area surrounding the Toyota plant. Boycotting US-built Toyota vehicles would hurt this area much more than boycotting Bourbon.

    Back in Detroit's heyday, it must have been convenient being right
    across the border - I remember reading about Canadian-branded GM cars
    in the 1980s. Now, with American cars being built everywhere, not so
    much.

    Studebaker built cars in Indiana and Canada (and maybe a few other places).
    In their last couple of years of car building, IIRC all of their autos were built at their Canadian plant and imported into the states.


    * SLMR 2.1a * I'm not a bigot, I hate everyone.
    --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Rob Mccart@1:2320/105 to MIKE POWELL on Monday, March 10, 2025 01:10:00
    Estimates seem to be if the tariffs go through they will add between
    >> $3000 and $12,000 to the cost of a new vehicle, average about $6000.

    Yeah, Trump seems real wishy-washy in that. Maybe because the Dow went down
    >over 1300 points the first two days of this week.

    I meant that Canada, if they mean business, should start tariffing American
    >made autos. There are a bunch of "red states" that make those, including
    >the states that went red just for this election.

    I think they are targeting specific things from 'Red' States that will
    cause the most annoyance/pain. Like Booze from Kentucky has pretty much
    been removed from our shelves here.

    As for autos, although Trump was talking about tariffs on them, part
    of the problem is our auto industries are so interconnected. A lot of
    parts from a single car may cross the border up to 8 times as they
    are worked on by both sides which would greatly increase the impact
    of generalized tariffs, plus both sides of the border are organized
    that certain models are made here and others there and then we deal
    those back and forth.

    I suppose if we were smart we would just start buying just vehicles that
    >> we make in Canada to avoid the tariffs altogether. I'd have to check
    >> but obviously the variety of vehicles available that way would not be
    >> very wide, which would obviously be a problem. More likely a lot of
    >> people will put off buying new cars longer than usual in the hopes that
    >> once Trump is gone this crap will come to an end.

    Funny because supposedly, per those defending the tariffs, part of the
    >reasoning behind them was that we are importing too many "American" cars
    >from Canada. ;)

    Yes, as suggested above, we have been more partners than rivals so
    there may be some truth to that but I seriously doubt that building
    some of your cars in plants in Canada was simple charity to us..

    The USA had also started building some car models in Mexico to save
    money but you ended up limiting that due to quality issues which,
    as mentioned earlier, is much less of a problem when they're built
    in Canada and the USA..

    ---
    * SLMR Rob * Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever - N Bonaparte
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Rob Mccart@1:2320/105 to KURT WEISKE on Monday, March 10, 2025 01:25:00
    The Fentanyl numbers coming in from Canada make it seem like a red
    >herring, though - can anyone confirm?

    All we have to go on are the news reports. They like to brag when they intercept drugs so I would think they were reporting all of it IN THE
    PAST.. Right now suggesting there is less of it might make it look
    better regarding the tariffs situation, or would finding More of it
    make our results look better? With something like that there's no way
    to know how much is getting across undetected, but both countries
    should be watching for it.

    It sounds like Fentanyl is a 2-way street between the US and Canada - we
    >intercepted 43 pounds coming into the US last year, Canada intercepted
    >11 pounds coming into Canada *from* the US.

    Yes, I'm sure all illegal stuff goes in both directions depending on
    conditions at the time, or where it is coming across.

    There are much better solutions that tarriffs. Continued cooperation,
    >perhaps?

    Yes, it would sound like it. I wonder if Trump's idea is that we
    spend $Billions to improve border sucurity and then you can stop doing
    much of it at all, saving you money.. (?)

    ---
    * SLMR Rob * Help stamp out mental illness... or I'll kill you!
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Rob Mccart@1:2320/105 to KURT WEISKE on Monday, March 10, 2025 01:51:00
    Oh, and they are working on a pipeline, East to West here. We talked
    about refineries the other day and apparently we do have refineries
    here, but they are all to the East and the bulk of our oil to the
    West and it was easier to pipe it to the USA than Truck it across
    Canada, which now may change if this goes through.

    Interesting. The article I read calling out US refineries refining
    > Canadian oil inferred that Canada lacked the capacity to refine, not
    > the transportation logistics.

    I don't know if they have the capacity to totally replace our deals
    with the USA, but I suppose while they are building the pipeline
    they can maybe make the refineries bigger as well, plus that's only
    for our use. The sale of oil to you will continue even if Trump puts
    his threatened 10% tariff on it. Trump wants the profit from that
    even if it costs you guys an estimated $10 more for a tank of gas.

    A global commerce model with open trading partners is/was a good thing,
    > but it requires all parties to act in the best interests of everyone.
    > One crony capitalist/isolationist/megalomaniac/grifter and the whole
    > model falls apart - as we're seeing now.

    Yes, a lot of what has been threatened seems to keep being postponed
    but, unfortunately, as long as the threat remains, we are starting to
    do things that will cost the USA many $millions as we prepare for what
    might never happen. Not tariffs but a lot of Canadians are angry about
    it and not buying American goods and cancelling trips there, thousands
    of people. Travel to the USA on this long March Break weekend was down
    over 40%. People are going, ironically, to Mexico or, if they can afford
    it, to some other country or finally getting around to touring Canada..

    There's a small chance that if Trump is screwing around, and not
    serious about this stuff, we are making changes to protect ourselves
    so a lot of damage will happen anyways.

    ---
    * SLMR Rob * A person in a passion rides a mad horse
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Rob Mccart@1:2320/105 to KURT WEISKE on Monday, March 10, 2025 01:57:00
    In my limited time in Canada recently, it seemed like most of the cars
    > were Japanese/Korean, with older American cars in the mix. Mind you,
    > this was BC where it's easier to get imported cars from the east
    > without having to transport them across provinces.

    There's obviously a mix but most of the cars I've owned were American
    cars (possibly some made in Canada).. Possibly the numbers could be
    more like under 50% compared to Asian models, but we have factories
    here building those cars as well, probably more of those built here
    than imported due to quality and standards issues.

    ---
    * SLMR Rob * santa@npole.com - Please send copy of list of bad girls
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Rob Mccart@1:2320/105 to AARON THOMAS on Monday, March 10, 2025 02:24:00
    Yes, and you've always had the option of using your own oil but an intelligent country would use as much of a finite resource like oil
    as they can get at a decent pricefrom other countries to save their

    There's a mystery about the prices here. The price right now is 3x what it wa
    >ack in 2016. If buying oil from Canada isn't solving that issue, then I'm ass
    >ng that drilling our own oil will solve it. Even if it doesn't bring the pric
    >own, it should at least solve the problem of being dependent on another count

    I think if there were a huge savings drilling your own oil the companies
    would have gone back to doing that long ago. It's smart to not use up all
    your own reserves if you can manage it though. Once it runs out elsewhere
    you have your own available to use and to sell at inflated prices due to
    the shortages. But I'm not sure you have as much oil as you wish you did. There's been a lot of damage due to Fracing and such as you try to get
    the very last of it out of old wells, and possible oil spill issues from
    oil fields deep in the ocean.

    Canada has the 3rd largest oil reserves in the world, the USA comes
    up in 9th place. (2025 numbers) In 2016 we had over 5 times the
    oil you did but now it's only about 2.5 times as much. Those numbers
    might have changed more from new discoveries than using it up..

    Same with his complaints about buying Canadian wood building products.
    You have lots of forests there, but a lot of people don't want to see
    them cut down and have blocked lumbering in many areas there.

    Instant gratification. Trump doesn't seem to worry much about anything
    that will cause problems more than 4 years in the future..

    But this shouldn't come as any surprise. Trump has been very vocal about ever
    >ing he intended to do all throughout his campaign. To panic now is like sayin
    >I never saw this coming."

    When Trump was making election speeches I don't recall him mentioning
    25% tariffs on Mexican and Canadian Imports. He definitely went on about
    making America great again, but that's not unusual..

    If the 25% across the board tariffs come in they estimate it will
    cost Canada more than a million jobs and the estimate is 1.9 million American jobs plus higher prices on almost everything. The numbers

    If the crystal ball is correct, then these results should serve as a wake-up
    >l to Canadians who believe that it's wise to depend on other countries.

    When you've had a safe, reliable market for 50+ years I guess you
    tend to start taking it for granted.

    Something that Trump and I have in common is that we're positive thinkers. I
    >nk that the next president will double down on Trump's executive orders. I'm
    >ing for one Trump's sons to be the next president.

    I guess time will tell. You may just end up being the richest country
    in the world with no one wanting to do business with you.

    No, I think too many people on both sides of the border are mad about
    this and I can't see what he's doing being good for ordinary people,
    although your super rich probably love him..

    ---
    * SLMR Rob * A clear conscience is a sure sign of a faulty memory
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to ROB MCCART on Monday, March 10, 2025 09:10:00
    I think they are targeting specific things from 'Red' States that will
    cause the most annoyance/pain. Like Booze from Kentucky has pretty much
    been removed from our shelves here.

    Which means they are missing the "Red States" that actually decided the election... PA, NC, OH, MI, WI. KY has very few electoral votes in
    comparison to most of those. We could go red, blue, or some other wild
    color and we make no difference.

    IMHO, they are targeting the little red states to posture that they are
    doing something "vengeful" but are too afraid to target the states that actually have many people living in them... the ones that actually decided
    the election... that could actually retaliate back.

    Funny because supposedly, per those defending the tariffs, part of the
    >reasoning behind them was that we are importing too many "American" cars
    >from Canada. ;)

    Yes, as suggested above, we have been more partners than rivals so
    there may be some truth to that but I seriously doubt that building
    some of your cars in plants in Canada was simple charity to us..

    I don't see it as a charity. Maybe Trump does. I suspect it more likely
    made some sort of business sense, as you also do. Businesses are generally going to do what makes them money and less of what fits their political ideology... that is, if they want to stay in business! ;)

    The USA had also started building some car models in Mexico to save
    money but you ended up limiting that due to quality issues which,
    as mentioned earlier, is much less of a problem when they're built
    in Canada and the USA..

    I would not have any qualms about buying an "American" car built in Canada.
    For that matter, I'd not have any qualms about buying a Canadian one but,
    to my knowledge, there have been no Canadian specific makes/models since
    the last years of Studebaker production. ;)


    * SLMR 2.1a * Old Moderator: Burned out shell of a computer hobbyist.
    --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to ROB MCCART on Monday, March 10, 2025 09:59:00
    I don't know if they have the capacity to totally replace our deals
    with the USA, but I suppose while they are building the pipeline
    they can maybe make the refineries bigger as well, plus that's only
    for our use. The sale of oil to you will continue even if Trump puts
    his threatened 10% tariff on it. Trump wants the profit from that
    even if it costs you guys an estimated $10 more for a tank of gas.

    If Trump were smart, he'd make an exception for oil "imported" into the US
    just to be turned into gasoline to be "exported" back to you all. That
    process is keeping Americans employed. IMHO, I am not sure how we could
    really even count that as an export since we are only providing the labor.
    The raw material (oil) comes from Canada and the resulting product
    (gasoline) is destined to go back. I guess it just cancels out.

    There's a small chance that if Trump is screwing around, and not
    serious about this stuff, we are making changes to protect ourselves
    so a lot of damage will happen anyways.

    The constant tariff yo-yo is not doing either country any good. It has
    not helped our stock market at all. Canada learning to become more self-reliant really won't help us, but at least it will help you all out a whole lot in the long run.


    * SLMR 2.1a * If I only had a 486 . . .
    --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:342/200 to Rob Mccart on Monday, March 10, 2025 09:43:42
    I think if there were a huge savings drilling your own oil the companies would have gone back to doing that long ago. It's smart to not use up all your own reserves if you can manage it though. Once it runs out elsewhere you have your own available to use and to sell at inflated prices due to the shortages. But I'm not sure you have as much oil as you wish you did.

    That does sound smart when considering the fact that the world has a limited oil supply. However, even if Canada gave us an excellent price, uninterrupted, I'm afraid of what can happen to the price when (for example) the USA starts complaining about a lack of border enforcement.

    Instant gratification. Trump doesn't seem to worry much about anything that will cause problems more than 4 years in the future..

    You're right, but Biden made us hungry for all this satisfaction. Trump could accidentally set off a nuclear bomb, and after putting that on a scale, we'd still be happy that Biden is gone.

    >I never saw this coming."

    When Trump was making election speeches I don't recall him mentioning
    25% tariffs on Mexican and Canadian Imports. He definitely went on about making America great again, but that's not unusual..

    He wasn't that specific, but I found (for example and article from PBS from Sep 27, 2024 (well before Election Day) that quotes him like this:

    "Former President Donald Trump has proposed a 60% tariff on goods from China and a 20% tariff on everything else the United States imports."

    https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/trump-favors-huge-new-tariffs-how-do-they- work

    He's mentioned it elsewhere too, but my point is that we were warned about this long before it ever happened and before he was re-elected.

    I'm confident that Pierre Poilievre will be able to help us resolve these issues.

    No, I think too many people on both sides of the border are mad about
    this and I can't see what he's doing being good for ordinary people, although your super rich probably love him..

    I can't speak for the super rich, but I have yet to hear any Trump supporters rescinding their endorsement of President Trump. I like Canada, and I have a few friends from Ontario, but I love President Trump. I literally pray for him every single day.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/200)
  • From Rob Mccart@1:2320/105 to MIKE POWELL on Tuesday, March 11, 2025 01:24:00
    >> In my limited time in Canada recently, it seemed like most of the cars
    >> were Japanese/Korean, with older American cars in the mix. Mind you,
    >> this was BC where it's easier to get imported cars from the east
    >> without having to transport them across provinces.

    They are Japanese, but were they actually made there? Toyota has a huge
    >plant (maybe their NA HQ?) just down the road from here. Honda has several
    >in the region, too. There are several large auto parts plants in the area
    >surrounding the Toyota plant. Boycotting US-built Toyota vehicles would hurt
    >this area much more than boycotting Bourbon.

    I actually thought there were more Asian plants in Canada but the auto
    plants we have are a Ford plant (Retooling to build Super Duty trucks),
    3 GM plants, a Chrysler/Dodge/Jeep plant, a Toyota Rav 4 plant, and a
    Honda Civic & CRV plant, all in Ontario.
    ---
    * SLMR Rob * Nuke 'em 'til they glow, then shoot 'em in the dark
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Rob Mccart@1:2320/105 to MIKE POWELL on Wednesday, March 12, 2025 01:02:00
    I think they are targeting specific things from 'Red' States that will
    >> cause the most annoyance/pain. Like Booze from Kentucky has pretty much
    >> been removed from our shelves here.

    Which means they are missing the "Red States" that actually decided the
    >election... PA, NC, OH, MI, WI. KY has very few electoral votes in
    >comparison to most of those. We could go red, blue, or some other wild
    >color and we make no difference.

    You'd know this stuff better than I do. It seemed to me they were targeting products from specific states that are the main or only supplier of that product so they will be upset enough about it to complain bloody murder
    to Trump..

    Yes, as suggested above, we have been more partners than rivals so
    >> there may be some truth to that but I seriously doubt that building
    >> some of your cars in plants in Canada was simple charity to us..

    I don't see it as a charity. Maybe Trump does. I suspect it more likely
    >made some sort of business sense, as you also do. Businesses are generally
    >going to do what makes them money and less of what fits their political
    >ideology... that is, if they want to stay in business! ;)

    Trump sees thousands of jobs building cars in Canada that he can bring
    back to the USA to give you those jobs, but anylists were talking
    about that tonight on the news and said that what that would do is
    cripple American car makers because you can't suddenly throw together
    a car building plant. They said it would cost many $Billions and take
    years for that to be completed, and then you could pretty much bet
    that almost all Canadians would never buy an American car again,
    and we would very quickly be able to retool existing plants here to
    start making more Asian cars here which would also compete with
    your car makers at some level unless tariffs were left on forever.

    The USA had also started building some car models in Mexico to save
    >> money but you ended up limiting that due to quality issues which,
    >> as mentioned earlier, is much less of a problem when they're built
    >> in Canada and the USA..

    I would not have any qualms about buying an "American" car built in Canada.
    > For that matter, I'd not have any qualms about buying a Canadian one but,
    >to my knowledge, there have been no Canadian specific makes/models since
    >the last years of Studebaker production. ;)

    No, it doesn't look like there are any truly Canadian car companies.
    I think one or two were trying to start up over the years but never
    went anywhere.

    ---
    * SLMR Rob * Where there's a will, there's an inheritance tax
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Rob Mccart@1:2320/105 to MIKE POWELL on Wednesday, March 12, 2025 01:21:00
    The sale of oil to you will continue even if Trump puts
    >> his threatened 10% tariff on it. Trump wants the profit from that
    >> even if it costs you guys an estimated $10 more for a tank of gas.

    If Trump were smart, he'd make an exception for oil "imported" into the US
    >just to be turned into gasoline to be "exported" back to you all.

    I think that was one of the things that showed Trump is in it just for
    the money he can make. Tariffs on oil which mostly goes to make gas
    and such for your country has no benefit other than costing you all
    more money, which is all going to your government.

    The constant tariff yo-yo is not doing either country any good. It has
    >not helped our stock market at all. Canada learning to become more
    >self-reliant really won't help us, but at least it will help you all out a
    >whole lot in the long run.

    Time will tell. I think everything he plans will be scaled down as
    people and huge corporations realize how much it is going to cost
    them when few of them will get any benefit from it. Theoretically
    some new jobs will be created but I'm not sure there will be nearly
    as many jobs created as are lost due to the tariffs. The only winner
    will be the government raking in the tariffs..

    They have already said that tariff money here will be used to
    support people who the tariffs hurt, like grants to companies
    trying to stay afloat and subsidizing pay for people who would
    have been laid off so the company can keep on all the workers
    working fewer hours but still paid close to their full time
    salaries and retaining their company benefits.

    I don't think you'll hear Trump offer that. He may say something
    about cutting taxes, but most of those cuts will likely benefit
    the rich more than the poor.

    ---
    * SLMR Rob * A beer is an acceptable alternative to almost anything
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Rob Mccart@1:2320/105 to AARON THOMAS on Wednesday, March 12, 2025 01:53:00
    I think if there were a huge savings drilling your own oil the companies would have gone back to doing that long ago. It's smart to not use up all your own reserves if you can manage it though. Once it runs out elsewhere you have your own available to use and to sell at inflated prices due to the shortages. But I'm not sure you have as much oil as you wish you did.

    That does sound smart when considering the fact that the world has a limited
    > supply. However, even if Canada gave us an excellent price, uninterrupted, I
    >afraid of what can happen to the price when (for example) the USA starts comp
    >ning about a lack of border enforcement.

    It seems some things like that are more an excuse than a reason. I can
    see the USA complaining about illegal immigrants coming in from, or
    through, Mexico, but there's a LOT more of it there than through Canada,
    and things like drugs, I'd be willing to bet more drugs are moving from
    the USA into Canada than in the other direction. Both things are bad of
    course but that should have made a good case for having a united service working together policing the border rather than putting tariffs on
    everything we sell the USA.

    When Trump was making election speeches I don't recall him mentioning
    25% tariffs on Mexican and Canadian Imports.

    He wasn't that specific, but I found (for example and article from PBS from S
    >27, 2024 (well before Election Day) that quotes him like this:

    "Former President Donald Trump has proposed a 60% tariff on goods from China
    > a 20% tariff on everything else the United States imports."

    Some of it was expected, like Canada put a 100% tariff on cheap electric
    cars coming in from China. We are fighting new tariffs from China now
    as a result of that but, in that case, it was a specific item that was
    going to be a big problem.

    And countries like China are always a problem. If sales start to drop
    off, they keep the factories making goods and then their government
    subsidizes them so that they can sell stuff in foreign countries far
    cheaper than they can be made there, even ignoring what workers are paid.
    It saves them paying to support people not working, which avoids creating
    a 'class' of people who get used to living off of the government dollar
    without having to work, which can happen and can actually become
    generational where families haven't really had a job in generations.

    I'm confident that Pierre Poilievre will be able to help us resolve
    >these issues.

    I'm not sure who would be best in Canada.. A new Liberal leader was
    voted in to replace Trudeau and the news that Trudeau was resigning
    had already reduced Poilievre's lead in the polls from 20% to 1%,
    and that was before the new Liberal leader Mark Carney was chosen
    with 86% of the vote and financial backing that was 10 times what
    the other potential candidates were getting, so he is super popular
    and that may gain the Liberals even more ground.

    That said though, Carney has never been elected to a post in his
    life. He's not a politician, he is a Banker on a huge scale and
    I fear that if he is let loose in charge of the country he will
    do marvelous things to make the country successful, but cut support
    to care for the poor and older people because that's too expensive
    to be 'pracitcal'. Bottom Line above all else? Maybe..

    No, I think too many people on both sides of the border are mad about
    this and I can't see what he's doing being good for ordinary people, although your super rich probably love him..

    I can't speak for the super rich, but I have yet to hear any Trump supporters
    >scinding their endorsement of President Trump. I like Canada, and I have a fe
    >riends from Ontario, but I love President Trump. I literally pray for him eve
    >single day.

    We'll all have to see what happens and then take another look to see
    how we feel about it a year or two from now.
    ---
    * SLMR Rob * Got into the gene pool when the lifeguard wasn't watching
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to ROB MCCART on Wednesday, March 12, 2025 08:08:00
    Trump sees thousands of jobs building cars in Canada that he can bring
    back to the USA to give you those jobs, but anylists were talking
    about that tonight on the news and said that what that would do is
    cripple American car makers because you can't suddenly throw together
    a car building plant. They said it would cost many $Billions and take
    years for that to be completed, and then you could pretty much bet
    that almost all Canadians would never buy an American car again,
    and we would very quickly be able to retool existing plants here to
    start making more Asian cars here which would also compete with
    your car makers at some level unless tariffs were left on forever.

    Political analysts said Trump wanted this second term to "build his
    legacy." It really sounds like any chance of that legacy being positive
    will be very short term... possibly less than the next four years... and that it will eventually turn out to be a negative one.

    Someone mentioned in another echo that they thought all the posturing about tarrifs was to get other countries to lower/eliminate existing tarrifs that they have on existing goods. In the cases of Canada and Mexico, I was not aware of any serious tarrifs existing before he started this. China might
    be a different matter, though.

    I would not have any qualms about buying an "American" car built in
    anada.
    > For that matter, I'd not have any qualms about buying a Canadian one but,
    >to my knowledge, there have been no Canadian specific makes/models since
    >the last years of Studebaker production. ;)

    No, it doesn't look like there are any truly Canadian car companies.
    I think one or two were trying to start up over the years but never
    went anywhere.

    If they still made Studebakers, I would be considering one right about
    now. ;)

    Mike

    * SLMR 2.1a * MANIAC - An early computer built by nuts.
    --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to ROB MCCART on Wednesday, March 12, 2025 07:42:00
    If Trump were smart, he'd make an exception for oil "imported" into the US
    >just to be turned into gasoline to be "exported" back to you all.

    I think that was one of the things that showed Trump is in it just for
    the money he can make. Tariffs on oil which mostly goes to make gas
    and such for your country has no benefit other than costing you all
    more money, which is all going to your government.

    So far (knock-on-wood), gas prices have not gone up in this area yet. I am
    a little surprised that speculation hasn't at least caused them to jump.

    Time will tell. I think everything he plans will be scaled down as
    people and huge corporations realize how much it is going to cost
    them when few of them will get any benefit from it. Theoretically
    some new jobs will be created but I'm not sure there will be nearly
    as many jobs created as are lost due to the tariffs. The only winner
    will be the government raking in the tariffs..

    What I suspect also.

    They have already said that tariff money here will be used to
    support people who the tariffs hurt, like grants to companies
    trying to stay afloat and subsidizing pay for people who would
    have been laid off so the company can keep on all the workers
    working fewer hours but still paid close to their full time
    salaries and retaining their company benefits.

    I don't think you'll hear Trump offer that. He may say something
    about cutting taxes, but most of those cuts will likely benefit
    the rich more than the poor.

    Yes, those don't sound like things that Trump would offer, either.

    Mike

    * SLMR 2.1a * Time is a stream we fish in
    --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Kurt Weiske@1:218/1 to Rob Mccart on Wednesday, March 12, 2025 07:02:45
    Rob Mccart wrote to KURT WEISKE <=-

    Yes, it would sound like it. I wonder if Trump's idea is that we
    spend $Billions to improve border sucurity and then you can stop doing much of it at all, saving you money.. (?)

    Much of his behavior seems to revolve around coercing others to "kiss
    the ring". Illegally withhold congressionally approved funding, wait for
    the recipient to respond, get him to grovel. Or, better yet, pay $5
    million for an audience at Mar Al Lago.



    --- MultiMail/Win v0.52
    * Origin: http://realitycheckbbs.org | tomorrow's retro tech (1:218/1)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:342/200 to Rob Mccart on Wednesday, March 12, 2025 08:55:52
    It seems some things like that are more an excuse than a reason. I can
    see the USA complaining about illegal immigrants coming in from, or through, Mexico, but there's a LOT more of it there than through Canada, and things like drugs, I'd be willing to bet more drugs are moving from the USA into Canada than in the other direction. Both things are bad of course but that should have made a good case for having a united service working together policing the border rather than putting tariffs on everything we sell the USA.

    I'm with you on that. Law enforcement from both sides should work together, but we need the 2 administrations to work together.

    One of the obstacles is that Canada's ruling party (The Liberal Party) is on a mission to import all of India's undesirables into Canada. While they're working on that, there's no way that they can be in cooperation with the USA's border patrol. That's like trying to mop floors while you're wearing muddy boots.

    I'm not sure who would be best in Canada.. A new Liberal leader was
    voted in to replace Trudeau and the news that Trudeau was resigning
    had already reduced Poilievre's lead in the polls from 20% to 1%,

    The ratio of those numbers sounds very extreme. What about people you know? Have you heard other Canadians expressing confidence in Carney? Statisticians are hardly ever correct when they "conduct" similar polls here.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/200)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to KURT WEISKE on Thursday, March 13, 2025 10:34:00
    Yes, it would sound like it. I wonder if Trump's idea is that we
    spend $Billions to improve border sucurity and then you can stop doing much of it at all, saving you money.. (?)

    Much of his behavior seems to revolve around coercing others to "kiss
    the ring". Illegally withhold congressionally approved funding, wait for
    the recipient to respond, get him to grovel. Or, better yet, pay $5
    million for an audience at Mar Al Lago.

    I think the hammer may have just hit the nail on the head.


    * SLMR 2.1a * Something Amiss? Hi, I'm Something Amister.
    --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)