But OK, if Lee is what it all boils down to, I still don't see why those othe rnets can't have their echoes distributed the regular FidoWeb way. Private echoe s are still respected AFAIK, so why?
Yeah, well, I don't see Lee the way you do, that's for sure. And I think even told you why in a netmail some time ago.
But OK, if Lee is what it all boils down to, I still don't see why thos othernets can't have their echoes distributed the regular FidoWeb way. Priv echoes are still respected AFAIK, so why?
Othernets do not care jack-shit about Fido distribution methods. EOT.
nonstop stupid constant shit in Fidonews from a certain troll
character who is not even nodelisted. Thats example #1 and why you do not see this negative effect is astounding. But its his free speech, right?
but of all this bullshit bickering and flaming.
Yup... No matter how much it disgusts your fellow nodelistedFidoNet is not a sysop's network, it's a BBS network. It says
Sysops,
so in the very first actual sentence of P4.
Fidonet is, or at least used to be, for the BBS users not the
sysops. Maybe that's what putting some people off? They only got
to the sysop's echoes and never got to the core of FidoNet?
But I guess almost nobody remembers, or even cares about, the
users any more?
.. --- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; sv-SE;
rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101125 * Origin: news://eljaco.se (2:203/2)
Sysop: | KrAAB |
---|---|
Location: | Donna, TX |
Users: | 4 |
Nodes: | 20 (0 / 20) |
Uptime: | 199:34:14 |
Calls: | 543 |
Calls today: | 3 |
Files: | 2,274 |
Messages: | 47,450 |