Mike Powell wrote to JIMMYLOGAN <=-
It should be based on viability age. Living toddlers and teens are viable. Many late-term premature babies are viable without extensive life support. Most early term premature babies are very much not viable.
That makes a very logical cut-off point.
Though I disagree that that should be the 'cut-off,' I would GLADLY
go along with that as opposed to abortion on demand - any time, any
reason. At least it's a step in the right direction...
I don't believe that "on demand" is right, either. Over time, I would think that would be both physically and mentally damaging to the
persons who use abortion in that manner. The procedure should be more
of a last resort.
I don't believe that "on demand" is right, either. Over time, I would think that would be both physically and mentally damaging to the
persons who use abortion in that manner. The procedure should be more of a last resort.
So you agree that 'on demand' should not be the norm? Or just that it is
not healthy?
| Sysop: | KrAAB |
|---|---|
| Location: | Donna, TX |
| Users: | 2 |
| Nodes: | 20 (0 / 20) |
| Uptime: | 03:22:25 |
| Calls: | 352 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 1,669 |
| D/L today: |
12 files (9,999K bytes) |
| Messages: | 37,959 |