I have been wondering, on a new installation of Synchronet on Linux, do you
I have been wondering, on a new installation of Synchronet onLinux, do you
it's easier to use with the symlinks, IMO.
My system is setup with them, but would you tell me why you feel that way?I
My system is setup with them, but would you tell me why you feel that way?
well for an old guy like me it's easier not yo have to remember where everything is stored and not havingto set environment variables each time i wanted to start sbbsctrl.
The message you were replying to was about using symlinks in Linux, though s
In Linux, at least for anything running under Bash, you can set environment
In Linux, at least for anything running under Bash, you can set
environment
sbbsctrl is in the linux version, too. in the exec directory, last time i ran synchronet under linux.
The message you were replying to was about using symlinks in Linux, though s
In Linux, at least for anything running under Bash, you can set environment
sbbsctrl is in the linux version, too. in the exec directory, last time
i ran synchronet under linux.
Robert Wolfe wrote to NIGHTFOX <=-
In Linux, at least for anything running under Bash, you can set environment
sbbsctrl is in the linux version, too.
in the exec directory, last time i ran synchronet under linux.
Not that I've heard of. :-) Perhaps you're thinking gtkmonitor? There'sneve
| Sysop: | KrAAB |
|---|---|
| Location: | Donna, TX |
| Users: | 6 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 42:33:01 |
| Calls: | 56,907 |
| Files: | 3,065 |
| D/L today: |
3 files (1,879K bytes) |
| Messages: | 53,403 |